Professional Biography
Image of Matthew Gordon

Matthew P. Gordon Partner

  • Seattle

    D +1.206.359.3552

    F +1.206.359.9000

    Seattle

    1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900

    Seattle, WA 98101-3099

    +1.206.359.3552

    MGordon@perkinscoie.com

loader

Overview

Experience

News

Insights

  • 12.17.2018
    Belated Government Dismissal of False Claims Act Cases: DOJ Maneuvering in Post-Escobar and Granston Memo Era
    Updates

    On November 30, 2018, the solicitor general filed an amicus brief in the U.S. Supreme Court supporting the relators’ opposition to certiorari in Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Campie, et al., No. 17-936. Yet the government’s brief disclosed for the first time that it would dismiss the relators’ qui tam complaint on remand, allegedly because discovery would interfere with federal agency responsibilities.

  • 08.14.2017
    Ninth Circuit Raises Bar for Approving Changes in State Medicaid Reimbursement
    Updates
    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Court raised the bar last week for what states must prove to establish that their Medicaid provider reimbursement rates are sufficient to ensure a robust network of providers for Medicaid beneficiaries.
  • 09.22.2015
    Pharma and Medical Device Industry Victory in Off-Label Marketing Decision
    Updates
    The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York recently held that the FDA may not constitutionally bring a misbranding action based on truthful and non-misleading off-label promotion of an FDA-approved drug, thereby helping to clarify lingering uncertainty over the scope of First Amendment protection afforded statements by drug representatives, at least in states located in the Second Circuit.
  • 03.02.2015
    Supreme Court Strikes Down State Professional Boards’ Antitrust Immunity
    Updates
    In a ruling with significant implications for state professional licensing boards and their members, on February 25, 2015, the United States Supreme Court found that practitioner-controlled state boards do not have inherent immunity from federal antitrust liability if they operate without active supervision by disinterested state actors. 
  • 05.2012
    Idaho’s Peer Review Privilege - Lessons Learned
    Articles

    The Advocate

  • 2011
    Dancing Around Daubert: The Idaho Supreme Court’s Puzzling Approach to Expert Testimony
    Articles

    Idaho Law Review

  • 2009
    Why Researchers Might Have a Legal Duty to Disclose Individual Research Findings to Research Subjects
    Articles

    Food & Drug Law Journal

  • 10.19.2015
    The Physician Payment Sunshine Act: A Primer for the Life Sciences and Health Care Industries
    Speaking Engagements
    Society of Research Administrators International Annual Meeting / Las Vegas, NV
  • 03.26.2014
    Ethical Pitfalls When Contacting Former Employees
    Speaking Engagements
    Idaho State Bar Employment Section / Boise, ID
  • 02.19.2014
    Protect Your Neck: Intellectual Property for Wine Producers
    Speaking Engagements
    Idaho State Wine Commission Annual Meeting / Boise, ID

RELATED INFORMATION

Bar and Court Admissions

  • Washington
  • Idaho
  • Montana
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington
  • U.S. District Court for the District of Idaho

Education

  • Harvard Law School, J.D., magna cum laude, 2008
  • University of Washington, M.P.H., Public Health Genetics, 2005
  • University of Puget Sound, B.S., Biology, summa cum laude, 1994, Phi Beta Kappa