|
Experience
Appellate
Nuvo Pharmaceuticals (Ireland), et al. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Argued on behalf of Mylan in the Federal Circuit over patent rights to naproxen/esomeprazole magnesium tablets (Vimovo®) used to treat the risk of ulcer formation in patients requiring long-term treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The Federal Circuit reversed the district court, holding the asserted claims of the two challenged patents invalid. Case No. 17-2473
BTG International Ltd., et al. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Represented Mylan in a complex consolidated appeal concerning district court Hatch-Waxman litigation and related IPR proceedings. The patent at issue claimed methods for treating prostate cancer using abiraterone acetate and prednisone. The Federal Circuit issued a favorable judgment affirming that the PTAB had correctly canceled the asserted claims on obviousness grounds. Case No. 19-1147
St. Regis Mohawk Tribe and Allergan, Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Represented Mylan in an appeal challenging the PTAB’s ruling that tribal sovereign immunity does not insulate patents from IPR proceedings. The appeal resulted in a favorable decision from the Federal Circuit confirming that tribal sovereign immunity does not apply to IPRs. Case Nos. 18-1638, -1639, -1640, -1641, -1642, -1643
HTC Corp., et al. v. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, et al.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Representing HTC in FRAND-licensing dispute relating to standard-essential patents and cellular telecommunications technology. Case No. 19-40566
Van der Hoeven Horticultural Projects B.V. v. Glass Investment Projects, Inc.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Represented patent owner on appeal following an IPR decision upholding challenged claims over the prior art. Obtained summary affirmance upholding favorable judgment on appeal. Case No. 18-2234
Uniloc USA, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Participated in successful defense of the district court’s judgment in favor of defendants-appellees dismissing the asserted complaint for patent infringement on patent-eligibility grounds. Case No. 17-2051
Digital Media Technologies, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., et al.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Represented defendants-appellees and obtained affirmance after the district court dismissed all asserted patent infringement claims for lack of patent eligibility. Case No. 17-2408
Cousin v. Wilkie
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Represented veteran seeking VA compensation for back disability associated with Korean War-era service in the U.S. Army. Argued before the Federal Circuit on the veteran’s behalf and obtained a precedential judgment reversing the VA’s denial of retrospective benefits. Case No. 17-1971
Daniel v. Armslist, LLC, et al.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin
Represented the Computer and Communications Industry Association as non-party amicus curiae. Appeal No. 2017AP000344
ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. v. Johnson Health Tech Co.*
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Obtained summary affirmance of an IPR decision canceling all claims of the challenged patent. Case No. 15-2027
Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp. v. Irwin Industrial Tool Co.*
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Represented appellant and prepared briefing in an appeal from consolidated IPR decisions. Case settled prior to oral argument. Case Nos. 2017-1215, -1216
Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Riddell, Inc. et al. vs. Kranos IP II Corp.
Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Filed petition and argued on behalf of Riddell in IPR proceeding regarding a patent directed to sports helmet technology. Case settled after oral hearing. Case No. IPR2018-01164
Amazon Digital Services, Inc., et al. v. Uniloc Luxembourg SA
Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Prepared briefing and argued at the oral hearing on behalf of petitioners in opposition to the patent owner’s motion to amend during IPR proceedings. The motion to amend was denied by the Board in a precedential order. Case No. IPR2017-00948
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc., et al. v. Allergan, Inc. and the St. Regis Mohawk Tribe
Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Represented Mylan in IPR proceedings challenging several pharmaceutical patents and opposing efforts to terminate the IPRs based on tribal sovereign immunity. Case Nos. IPR2016-01127, -01128, -01129, -01130, -01131, -013332
Dyaco International Inc. v. Johnson Health Tech Co.*
Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Represented patent owner in two IPR proceedings that were terminated before institution. Case Nos. IPR2014-00754 and -00755
District Court
Kranos IP Corp. et al. v. Riddell, Inc.
Represented Riddell in successful defense against patent infringement claims relating to sports helmet technologies. Case No. 17-cv-06802
VocalTag Ltd. v. Agis Automatisering B.V.*
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin
Represented defendant in patent infringement litigation and obtained favorable summary judgment order disposing of all infringement claims. Case No. 13-cv-00612
Veterans Benefits
Cousin v. Wilkie
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Represented veteran seeking VA compensation for back disability associated with Korean War-era service in the U.S. Army. Argued before the Federal Circuit on the veteran’s behalf and obtained a precedential judgment reversing the VA’s denial of retrospective benefits. Case No. 17-1971
Cousin v. Wilkie
U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Represented veteran seeking VA compensation for back disability associated with Korean War-era service in the U.S. Army on appeal from the Board of Veterans’ Appeals and on remand after obtaining a favorable decision from the Federal Circuit. Case No. 15-2175
Reed v. Shinseki*
U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Represented veteran in claim for VA disability compensation. Secured remand for further proceedings before the agency and secured a fee award under the Equal Access to Justice Act. Case No. 13-2661
*Prior Experience
