Joseph E. Mais Partner

In early August 2005, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued its opinion after a widely publicized three-month trial in In re The Walt Disney Company Derivative Litigation, absolving Disney's directors of liability in connection with the 1995-1996 hiring and firing of former Disney president Michael Ovitz. Ovitz received a severance package of approximately $140 million after his unsuccessful 14-month tenure at Disney.

The pattern is familiar. A public company makes some positive announcements about a product. After some time passes, the company announces bad news about the product, leading to a decline in the stock price.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and recent changes in Securities and Exchange Commission and stock exchange requirements have imposed ever greater responsibilities on corporate directors. As these additional responsibilities expose directors to increasing risks, companies have struggled to attract and retain qualified candidates to serve as independent directors.

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 established a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. A company cannot be liable for making a forward-looking statement if, among other factors, the statement "is accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements identifying important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statement."

In recent years there has been an upsurge in the number of stockholder derivative lawsuits. This type of lawsuit differs fundamentally from a securities class action.