Professional Biography

Stevan R. Stark, Jr. Associate

  • Seattle

    D +1.206.359.8000

    F +1.206.359.9000

    Seattle

    1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900

    Seattle, WA 98101-3099

    +1.206.359.8000

    SStark@perkinscoie.com

loader

Overview

Experience

Patent Litigation

CoreLogic Inc. v. Fiserv, Inc.

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Represented Fiserv, Inc. in patent litigation relating to automated valuation models. Case settled just before trial.

EVS Codec Technologies, LLC et al. v. Huawei Device USA, Inc. et al.

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Counsel for Huawei in a patent case related to audio codecs. Successfully settled.

F5 Networks Inc. v. Radware

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Representing F5 Networks in a patent litigation relating to networking security and application protocols.

IA Labs v. Nintendo Company, Ltd., et al.

U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland
Represented Nintendo in patent litigation involving exercise-related video game accessories.

In re Certain Electronic Devices, Including Handheld Wireless Communication Devices

U.S. International Trade Commission
Defended HTC Corporation against allegations of patent infringement relating to performance and power management in semiconductors used in wireless communication devices.

LBS Innovations, LLC v. Aaron Brothers, Inc., et al.

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Counsel for Adams Golf in patent litigation related to online store locators.

Milestone Company, Ltd., et al. v. Nintendo of America Inc.

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington
Represented Nintendo of America Inc. in a patent case relating to imaging lenses for portable devices.

Open Parking, LLC v. ParkMe, Inc.

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Successfully defended ParkMe in a patent suit relating to Internet-based parking applications. The district court found the asserted patents to be directed to patent-ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101 and granted ParkMe’s motion to dismiss. The Federal Circuit affirmed on appeal.

Radware v. F5 Networks

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Federal Circuit Court of Appeals
Represented F5 Networks in patent litigation and jury trial relating to network packet routing. Obtained summary judgment of noninfringement on one of three patents, and favorable judgment on damages on other patents, all affirmed on appeal.

Transcenic, Inc. v. Google

U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Represented Google in patent litigation relating to image navigation functionality. Case resolved immediately before trial.

TransData v. CenterPoint Energy Houston Electric, et al.

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma
Represented multiple utilities in patent litigation relating to electric meters. Case resolved immediately before trial.

News

Insights

RELATED INFORMATION

Bar and Court Admissions

  • Washington
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Education

  • Seattle University School of Law, J.D., summa cum laude, 2007, Research & Technical Editor, Law Review
  • University of Utah, B.S., Computer Science, Minor Mathematics, 1996