Professional Biography
Image of Kyle Canavera

Kyle R. Canavera Partner

  • San Diego

    D +1.858.720.5782

    F +1.858.720.5799

    San Diego

    11452 El Camino Real, Suite 300

    San Diego, CA 92130-2080

    +1.858.720.5782

    KCanavera@perkinscoie.com

loader

Overview

Experience

Pulse Electronics, Inc. v. u.d. Electronic Corp.

U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, Case No. 3:18-cv-00373
Represented defendant UDE in district court litigation related to electronics component patents. Achieved complete victory on summary judgment, with result affirmed on appeal.

Ancora Technologies, Inc. v. TCT Mobile (U.S.) Inc.

U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Case No. 8:19-cv-02192
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Case No. IPR2020-01609
Represented defendant TCL in district court litigation and inter partes review (IPR) related to computer security patent. Case settled favorably after institution of IPR.

Netskope, Inc. v. Bitglass, Inc.

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Case Nos. IPR2021-01045, PGR2021-00091
Represented petitioner Netskope in successful IPR and post-grant review (PGR) proceedings against networking-related patents. All challenged claims found unpatentable and cancelled.

H-E-B, LP V. Wadley Holdings, LLC

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Case No. 6:20-cv-00081
Represented plaintiff H-E-B in four-patent case against Home Depot and other vendors of rotomolded coolers. Case settled favorably before trial, after summary judgment of infringement.

Parus Holdings, Inc. v. Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Case No. 2:21-cv-00393
Represented defendants Charles Schwab and Bank of America in case related to speech recognition technology. Case settled favorably at the end of discovery.

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. v. Intersil Corporation

U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, Case No. 1:16-cv-01125
Represented Monolithic Power Systems in litigation including claims for trade secret misappropriation, tortious interference, disparagement, defamation, and unfair competition. Case settled favorably before trial.

In the Matter of Certain Electronic Devices Having Wireless Communication Capabilities and Components Thereof

U.S. International Trade Commission, Investigation No. 337-TA-1284
Represented respondent TCL in investigation involving wireless communications patents. Investigation settled favorably at the end of discovery.

In the Matter of Certain Multi-Domain Test and Measurement Instruments

U.S. International Trade Commission, Investigation No. 337-TA-1104
Represented complainant Tektronix in a two-patent case concerning multidomain test and measurement instruments. Investigation terminated after consent order by respondents agreeing not to import products at issue.

News

Insights

RELATED INFORMATION

Bar and Court Admissions

  • California
  • District of Columbia
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
  • U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
  • U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas

Education

  • Johns Hopkins University, M.S., Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2014
  • The George Washington University Law School, J.D., cum laude, 2013, Staff Member, AIPLA Quarterly Journal
  • George Mason University, M.S., Computer Science, 2012
  • Xavier University, B.S., Computer Science, magna cum laude, 2006

Languages

  • Spanish