Companies engaged in the bid protest process face new  and heightened complexities, from determining the protest viability to successfully filing or defending contract decisions.

loader

Overview

Experience

Representation of KBR, Inc. in multiple protests arising out of LOGCAP V, the U.S. Army’s Logistics Civil Augmentation Program, before the Government Accountability Office (GAO), the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit:

  • DynCorp International, LLC, B-41750610, DynCorp International, LLC v. United States, Case No. 19-1133C (Fed. Cl.) and DynCorp International LLC v. United States (Fed. Cir. 2020-2041).
  • Matter of AECOM Management Services, Inc., B-417506.12, AECOM Management Services, Inc. v. United States, Case No. 1:19-cv-01176-LAS (Fed. Cl.).
  • Matter of Fluor Intercontinental, Inc., B-417506.14, Fluor Intercontinental, Inc. v. United States, Case No. 19-1580 (Fed. Cl.).

Vectrus Sys. Corp. v. United States, Fed. Cl. 20-2053, Vectrus Sys. Corp., B-419143

Defense of a defense contractor’s award of a $558 million contract to provide base support services to the U.S. Air Force in Africa and Europe in back-to-back protests before the GAO and the U.S. Court of Federal Claims.

Sabre Systems, B-420090.3

Protest of a U.S. Navy contract for mission system software engineering, development, and related support. Our team prevailed in its challenge to the agency’s evaluation of total professional compensation plans.

ATA Aerospace, LLC, B-419962.2, B-419962.3

Representation of intervenor-awardee in a bid protest before the GAO arising out of a National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) small business contract for mechanical engineering and other services.

ENGlobal Government Services, Inc., B-419612.1, B-412612.2, B-4129612.3 and ENGlobal Government Services, Inc. v. United States, Case No. 21-02317 (Fed. Cl.).

Protest defense of defense contractor’s award of a $38 million contract for maintenance and sustainment of automated fuel handling equipment for the Defense Logistics Agency (DLA).

Amentum Services, Inc., B-420534.1

Representation of Serco Inc. in protest before GAO challenging the Navy’s contract award.

SOS International, LLC, B-421598.2; B-421598.3, July 11, 2023

Protest of a U.S. Army protest task order award valued at $106 million for information technology services and support. On behalf of SOS International, LLC (SOSi), we protested the Army’s evaluation of SOSi’s proposal as technically acceptable and the decision not to conduct interchanges with SOSi. After an Outcome Prediction hearing, the Army took corrective action.

Cynergy Professional Systems, LLC, B-421662, May 24, 2023

Protest on behalf of Cynergy Professional Systems, LLC of a U.S. Department of State contract award valued at $17 million for commercial-off-the-shelf radio repeater configurations, devices, and related services, resulting in the Department of State taking corrective action.

Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., B-421354.1, January 17, 2023

Representation of Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. (Booz Allen) in a protest of a sole-source task order award by the Naval Air Systems Command for professional consulting services. Booz Allen challenged the Navy’s limited source justification as insufficient to demonstrate that there is only one source capable of providing the services required. The Navy took corrective action by cancelling the award and completing the requirement.

Sierra7, Inc.; V3Gate, LLC, B-421109; B-421109.2; B-421109.3; B-421109.4, January 4, 2023

Representation of Minburn Technology Group, LLC as an intervenor in defending its contract award from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) for personal computers, valued at $418 million.

News

Insights