Skip to main content
Home
Home

Recent DOJ Setback Unlikely To Shift Labor Antitrust Focus

Recent DOJ Setback Unlikely To Shift Labor Antitrust Focus

Labor Manufacturing

Late last month, the U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division, suffered another defeat in its ongoing efforts to criminally prosecute conduct affecting workers' compensation and job mobility.

Unlike the Antitrust Division's prior litigated losses in labor market cases, United States of America v. Patel never reached the jury because U.S. District Judge Victor A. Bolden of the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut granted the defendants' motion for judgment of acquittal under Rule 29 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

Such motions are often made but very rarely granted due to defendants' "heavy burden" to establish that evidence of the alleged crime "is nonexistent or so meager that no reasonable jury could find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt," according to an April 28 order from Judge Bolden.

Read the full article on Law360.*

 

*Subscription-based publication

Print and share

Authors

Profile Picture
Partner
JBJacobs@perkinscoie.com

Notice

Before proceeding, please note: If you are not a current client of Perkins Coie, please do not include any information in this e-mail that you or someone else considers to be of a confidential or secret nature. Perkins Coie has no duty to keep confidential any of the information you provide. Neither the transmission nor receipt of your information is considered a request for legal advice, securing or retaining a lawyer. An attorney-client relationship with Perkins Coie or any lawyer at Perkins Coie is not established until and unless Perkins Coie agrees to such a relationship as memorialized in a separate writing.

202.654.1758

Explore more in

Home
Jump back to top