Protecting Privilege in Internal Investigations
Rarely does a week pass in White Collar and Investigation or SEC-regulatory outside counsel life that an auditor or government enforcement attorney does not request some interim or final read-out. These requests for information can encompass investigative process and factual findings, lists of search terms, interview outlines, or similar investigative materials.
However, this information, if provided, presents a very real risk of privilege waiver. This article encourages pushback against the "nobody else ever fights us on this" contention often heard from government enforcers and outside auditors wanting to "better understand" a client's internal investigation making these requests.
Print and share
Authors
Notice
Before proceeding, please note: If you are not a current client of Perkins Coie, please do not include any information in this e-mail that you or someone else considers to be of a confidential or secret nature. Perkins Coie has no duty to keep confidential any of the information you provide. Neither the transmission nor receipt of your information is considered a request for legal advice, securing or retaining a lawyer. An attorney-client relationship with Perkins Coie or any lawyer at Perkins Coie is not established until and unless Perkins Coie agrees to such a relationship as memorialized in a separate writing.