Chris Hall Partner

In a recent decision by the Delaware Court of Chancery, Auriga Capital Corp. v. Gatz Properties, LLC, C.A. 4390-CS (Del. Ch. Jan. 27, 2012), the court strongly reaffirmed that managers of a limited liability company owe traditional fiduciary duties to the limited liability company and its minority members unless such duties are explicitly reduced or eliminated by the terms of the limited liability company's operating agreement.

The Securities and Exchange Commission recently finalized its rules to conform the definition of “accredited investor” to the requirements under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.

In Gantler v. Stephens, C.A No. 2392, 2009 WL188828 (Del. Jan. 27, 2009), the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed a principle of corporate law that had been implied in prior decisions:  officers of Delaware corporations owe the same fiduciary duties of care and loyalty to the corporation and its shareholders as directors owe.  The Court also resolved contradictory prior opinions on the common law doctrine of shareholder ratification by limiting the doctrine to approval of board action that is not otherwise required to be approved by shareholders in order to be effective.

Proxy statement preparation and planning for annual meetings of stockholders are in full swing.  Along with proxy season comes the possibility that stockholders may submit proposals or nominations for consideration at the annual meeting.

The SEC recently approved final rules that significantly modify the registration, communications and offering processes under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The new rules will be effective December 1, 2005. The most significant changes include:

The Staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the SEC itself and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) each issued separate statements last week with guidance for companies implementing Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. This Update highlights some of the key concepts emphasized by the SEC and the PCAOB in last week's guidance and provides practical advice.

Attorneys in the Perkins Coie Corporate Finance Group recently authored an article titled "Advising the Board of Directors in Acquiring a Business" that was published in Insights: the Corporate & Securities Law Advisor. Authorizing significant acquisitions can create legal risks for directors, and directors who authorize acquisitions that prove unsuccessful can be subject to litigation.

In the SEC's recent focus on the quality of management's discussion and analysis, or MD&A, disclosure, it has re-emphasized the need to identify and analyze material trends, demands, commitments, events and uncertainties that could impact a company's liquidity, financial condition or operating results. This disclosure, the SEC believes, is critical to understanding a company's reported financial information and the extent to which reported information is indicative of future results or financial condition.

In publishing responses to a series of frequently asked questions (FAQ), the SEC's Office of the Chief Accountant has provided guidance about pre-approval policies and other matters relating to the SEC's auditor independence rules adopted in January 2003. Those rules became effective in May 2003 and, among other things, require a company's audit committee to pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by the company's auditors.

On August 8, 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed changes to the proxy rules that would expand disclosure regarding (a) the nominating committee and the process of nominating directors and (b) the process by which shareholders are able to communicate with a company's board of directors. The proposals do not require substantive changes by a company with respect to its nomination or shareholder communication processes; rather the proposals require disclosure of the details of the processes.

On January 28, 2003, the SEC published final rules implementing Section 306(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which generally prohibits insider trading during pension plan blackout periods. These rules became effective on January 26, 2003; however, the requirement to file notices of blackout periods with the SEC on Form 8-K is not effective until 60 days after publication of the rules in the Federal Register. For blackout periods occurring between January 26, 2003 and February 25, 2003, reporting companies should furnish blackout notices to directors and executive officers as soon as reasonably practicable. Blackout notices are not required for currently effective blackout periods that started before January 26, 2003.