Christopher A. Williams
- Firmwide Chair, Antitrust & Unfair Competition Litigation Practice
- Washington, D.C.
Notice
Before proceeding, please note: If you are not a current client of Perkins Coie, please do not include any information in this e-mail that you or someone else considers to be of a confidential or secret nature. Perkins Coie has no duty to keep confidential any of the information you provide. Neither the transmission nor receipt of your information is considered a request for legal advice, securing or retaining a lawyer. An attorney-client relationship with Perkins Coie or any lawyer at Perkins Coie is not established until and unless Perkins Coie agrees to such a relationship as memorialized in a separate writing.
Businesses rely on Chris to manage and navigate complex antitrust matters related to M&A and other commercial activities
Bringing a deep, business-focused approach to high-stakes commercial transactions, Christopher A. Williams helps clients seamlessly navigate the regulatory complexities of merger and conduct investigations by antitrust enforcement agencies across the globe.
A trusted adviser, Chris guides clients through the entire lifecycle of a deal, from early-stage counseling on diligence, pre-closing conduct, and merger notification requirements to merger investigations and challenges. He has extensive experience with merger filing analyses, having assessed more than 1,000 transactions for reportability under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act (HSR Act).
When regulatory challenges arise, Chris advocates for clients in Second Request and nonreportable merger investigations by the DOJ, FTC, and state attorneys general. His work includes developing "fix-it-first" solutions, negotiating merger settlements with regulatory agencies, and managing strategy in cross-border merger reviews. His global experience also includes helping clients close investigations and coordinate conditional clearances in multijurisdictional merger reviews before competition authorities in Asia, Europe, and North America.
Chris’ antitrust practice also includes counseling companies on antitrust compliance in connection with their business strategies, representing interested third parties in merger and conduct investigations, helping clients obtain approval as divestiture buyers in merger settlements, and advising clients in both affirmative and defensive antitrust litigation.
Chris is known for adapting quickly to clients’ needs and evolving legal issues. Representing clients ranging from emerging companies to market leaders, he tailors his antitrust strategies to highly regulated and technology-driven markets. He distills complex regulatory frameworks across diverse sectors and addresses the commercial realities of industries such as big data, fintech, software, healthcare, medical devices, pharmaceuticals, and clean energy.
Chris is a leading voice in competition law, connecting academic theory with high-stakes legal practice. He teaches antitrust law at prominent U.S. law schools, including Duke University School of Law, and mentors students and new lawyers from diverse backgrounds.
Areas of focus
Industries
Services
Education & Credentials
Education
- American University Washington College of Law, J.D., cum laude, Staff, Administrative Law Review, 2008
- Duke University, B.S., Economics and Public Policy Studies, cum laude, 2004
Bar and Court Admissions
-
District of Columbia
-
Florida
-
North Carolina
- U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- U.S. Court of International Trade
Related Employment
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Washington, D.C., Senior Counsel, 2020-2021; Of Counsel, 2018-2020; Associate, 2011-2018
- Squire, Sanders & Dempsey, Washington, D.C., Associate, 2008-2011
Professional Recognition
Named to the "Rising Stars" lists published by Washington DC Super Lawyers, 2014-2021
Impact
Professional Leadership
- Antitrust at Duke University School of Law, Senior Lecturing Fellow
Professional Experience
Merger Review
- Represented a paint distributor in its acquisition by a competitor, guiding the client through a comprehensive FTC preliminary investigation that raised questions about horizontal competitive effects in a distribution market, resulting in clearance without a Second Request.
- Represented a clinical research organization in resolving an FTC preliminary investigation of its acquisition by a larger competitor.
- Represented an owner-operator as a potential divestiture buyer to resolve the FTC’s concerns with a proposed merger between residential care services providers.
- Represented a manufacturer of valued-added proteins in resolving a DOJ preliminary investigation of its acquisition by a major North American food manufacturers and distributor.
- Represented a domain management services company in a lengthy DOJ preliminary investigation into its acquisition of a competitor. Convinced DOJ to close its investigation without issuing a Second Request.
- Represented an industrial robotics company in a DOJ preliminary investigation of its acquisition of another AI-based robotics company. Avoided a Second Request investigation into potential and nascent competition concerns initially raised by DOJ.
- Represented a leading manufacturer and distributor of building materials in a preliminary investigation by DOJ and FTC involving an HSR-reportable acquisition of a leading wholesale distributor and manufacturer of building materials. Convinced staff to close the investigation during the initial HSR waiting period by resolving horizontal competition and vertical relationship concerns raised by staff.
- Represented a leading wood products manufacturer in a preliminary investigation by DOJ involving an HSR-reportable acquisition of a competitor. Convinced staff to close the investigation during the initial HSR waiting period by resolving horizontal competition and vertical relationship concerns raised by staff.
- Represented a private equity fund in a preliminary investigation by DOJ of its sale of an engineered wood products company to another private equity company. Convinced staff to close the investigation during the initial HSR waiting period, resolving vertical relationship concerns raised by staff.
- Represented a specialty provider of value-based healthcare services in its acquisition by the leading provider of healthcare services for that same specialty and its joint venture with physician groups. Advised on antitrust risk, highlighting the risk of an FTC investigation, advocated for the client during the preliminary investigation of the transaction, and prepared the client to respond to a civil investigative demand issued by FTC in connection with the Second Request issued to lead buyer.
- Advised a processor of implantable human tissue on antitrust risk of a potential sale to a competitor.
- Recommended a “fix-it-first” strategy to a specialty pharmaceutical company that avoided FTC scrutiny in the HSR review of its acquisition of a competitor.
- Represented a specialty pharmaceutical company in its acquisition of a competitor. Convinced FTC staff to close its preliminary investigation into the merger before expiration of the HSR waiting period.
- Advised Pacira BioSciences on antitrust matters in connection with its acquisition of Flexion Therapeutics.
- Represented R1 RCM, a provider of revenue cycle performance solutions for health systems, hospitals, and physician groups in its acquisition of Acclara.
- Represented an industrial robotics company in a DOJ preliminary investigation of its acquisition of another AI-based robotics company.
- Advised PharmaCann, a vertically integrated cannabis company, in its acquisition of LivWell Enlightened Health.
- Represented 11:11 Systems, Inc. in the acquisition of Green Cloud Technologies, LLC, an independent channel-only cloud Infrastructure-as-a-Service provider.
- Represented S.D.S. Lumber Co. and S.D.S. Co., L.L.C. in their sale to Twin Creeks Timber, LLC, The Conservation Fund, and WKO, Inc.
- Represented personal finance platform in its acquisition by a leading financial software company, which resulted in a consent decree to divest a portion of the seller’s business to a third party to resolve antitrust concerns.*
- Managed large-scale, antitrust integration-planning compliance project for a major telecom merger.*
- Represented a provider of enterprise networking equipment, in connection with an FTC Second Request investigation concerning its acquisition by a major semiconductor company. The investigation was resolved with a behavioral remedy via consent order to resolve vertical concerns with the proposed acquisition. Coordinated global antitrust filings and negotiations of behavioral remedies to obtain conditional clearance for the transaction in China, the European Union, and Japan.*
- Represented a leading media company before the DOJ Antitrust Division in a radio station asset exchange with another broadcaster. The other broadcaster divested radio station assets to the client to resolve antitrust concerns with its acquisition of another radio company.*
- Advised a life sciences company on competition matters before the FTC in its successful defense against a hostile takeover by a competitor.*
- Represented a real estate technology company in an FTC Second Request investigation related to its acquisition by a competitor.*
- Represented a catalyst manufacturer in a preliminary investigation by the FTC of an acquisition of a competitor. Convinced staff to close the investigation after a pull-and-refile, arguing that the merged firm’s ability to increase price or reduce output or innovation was constrained by large customers and the likelihood of entry of independent suppliers in Asia.*
- Advised a wholesale grocery cooperative in connection with its acquisition of a competitor, which combined the two largest national wholesale food cooperatives, in a preliminary investigation by the FTC.*
* Prior experience
Litigation
- Represented a global generics company in an antitrust suit against a branded pharmaceutical company for using REMS as a pretext to prevent the generic supplier from acquiring necessary samples of the branded product to conduct bioequivalence studies.*
- Represented a global generics company in an antitrust suit against a branded pharmaceutical company for product hopping strategies.*
* Prior experience