Publications
-
03.18.2024California Land Use & Planning Law - 39th EditionLawyer Publications
This comprehensive book provides an up-to-date summary and analysis of California's complex land use and planning laws. Cited by the California Supreme Court and numerous appellate courts and assigned at law schools across the state, it has been an authoritative resource for over 40 years.
-
10.05.2022California Allows Housing on Commercial Lands, Limits Required ParkingUpdatesIn what has become a near-annual ritual, California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed into law a large package of bills aimed at addressing the state’s glaring housing shortage.
-
04.30.2020Bay Area Counties Relax Restriction on Construction and Other Low-Risk ActivitiesUpdatesThe six Bay Area counties that led the way in requiring their citizens to shelter in place on March 16 and again on March 31—Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, San Francisco, San Mateo, and Santa Clara—issued new orders on April 29 extending many of the shelter-in-place requirements to May 31.
-
04.29.2020California Governor Newsom Allows Electronic Noticing Under CEQA and Suspends Tribal Consultation Requirements for 60 DaysUpdatesGovernor Gavin Newsom issued an executive order on April 22 suspending for a period of 60 days (1) the filing, posting, notice, and public access requirements related to certain notices under the California Environmental Quality Act, and providing for electronic posting; and (2) certain aspects of the consultation process with Native American tribes.
-
04.01.2020Non-Essential Construction Eliminated in More Restrictive Bay Area Shelter-in-Place OrdersUpdatesOn March 31, six Bay Area counties—Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, San Francisco, San Mateo, and Santa Clara—jointly issued new shelter-in-place restrictions that expand, clarify, and extend certain shelter-in-place restrictions until May 3, 2020.
-
03.27.2020California’s “Safer-at-Home” Order Permits Many Construction Projects to ContinueUpdatesGovernor of California Gavin Newsom and numerous other local municipalities—including, but not limited to, the counties of Humboldt, Lake, Los Angeles, Marin, Mendocino, Monterey, Napa, Sonoma, Sutter, Yolo, and Yuba, and the cities of Berkeley and Fresno—have issued shelter-in-place orders.
-
03.18.2020Bay Area COVID-19 Shelter-In-Place Orders Exempt Activities Necessary for Housing ConstructionUpdatesIn response to the COVID-19 (coronavirus) global pandemic, seven counties in California—Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, and Santa Cruz—issued orders requiring residents to shelter in place and mandating closure of many businesses.
-
06.27.2019U.S. Supreme Court’s Knick Cemetery Decision Buries Williamson—Takings Claimants May Go Directly to Federal CourtsUpdatesThe U.S. Supreme Court overturned a 34-year-old precedent established by Williamson Planning Comm’n v. Hamilton Bank, holding that landowners pursuing takings claims do not need to seek redress in state courts before pursuing a federal claim.
-
11.05.2012How Much Uncertainty Does CEQA Allow? Court Upholds EIR's Practical Approach for Evaluating Uncertain Cumulative Impacts, but Invalidates Biological Mitigation and Water Supply Analysis as Too UncertainUpdatesIn Preserve Wild Santee v. City of Santee, the court immersed itself in an EIR’s evaluation of the impacts of a large residential project proposing 1,395 homes and 1,400 acres of open space preserve.
-
05.04.2012Court Upholds Validity of Agreements Tolling the California Environmental Quality Act’s Statute of LimitationsUpdatesParties commonly enter into agreements tolling the statute of limitations for claims arising under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). However, the validity of such agreements, which some argue have thwarted the public’s interest in prompt resolution of CEQA disputes, has not been certain. In Salmon Protection & Watershed Network v. County of Marin, the California Court of Appeal made clear that such agreements are valid and enforceable, at least in certain circumstances.
-
04.27.2012Court Upholds Use of Future Baseline Under CEQAUpdatesIn Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority, the California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District ruled that, when supported by substantial evidence, projected future conditions may serve as an appropriate baseline for measuring a project's impacts under the California Environmental Quality Act.
-
01.12.2012Dissolution of Redevelopment Agencies Under AB1X 26: Wind-Down Requirements and Imminent DeadlinesCalifornia Redevelopment Association (CRA) v. Matosantos (No. S194861)UpdatesThe California Supreme Court’s decision in California Redevelopment Association (CRA) v. Matosantos Commercial Corporation (No. S194861) requires redevelopment agencies (RDAs) to wind down immediately.
-
12.30.2011California Supreme Court Upholds Legislation Dissolving Redevelopment Agencies and Invalidates the Voluntary "Opt In" Payments That Would Have Allowed Such Agencies to ContinueCalifornia Redevelopment Association v. Matosantos Commercial Corporation (No. S194861)UpdatesThe California Supreme Court has announced that recently enacted legislation disbanding redevelopment agencies is constitutional, while the companion legislation that would have allowed redevelopment agencies to continue to exist if they made "voluntary" payments is unconstitutional.
-
12.19.2011Federal Appeals Court Upholds Army Corps’ Economic Analysis for Issuance of Wetlands Permit Sierra Club v. Van Antwerp, U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (No. 10-5284)UpdatesIn Sierra Club v. Van Antwerp, decided by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, the Army Corps of Engineers approved a permit under the Clean Water Act (the Act) authorizing the fill of approximately 54 acres of wetlands for the construction of a large town center outside of Tampa, Florida.
-
12.14.2011California Court Rules That an EIR Need Not Evaluate the Impact of Sea Level Rise on a ProjectBallona Wetlands Land Trust v. City of Los Angeles (Case No. B231965)UpdatesCalifornia's Second District Court of Appeal has addressed provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) checklist questionnaire that appear to require analysis of the effects of environmental hazards on the proposed project.
-
12.01.2011California Court Reverts to Commonly Used Traffic Baseline for Analysis Under the California Environmental Quality ActPfeiffer v. City of Sunnyvale (H036310)UpdatesThe Sixth District Court of Appeal, in Pfeiffer v. Sunnyvale, recently upheld the use of a traffic baseline that included future projects despite an earlier Sixth District case that had raised serious questions about that practice.
-
11.18.2011County Violates California’s Anti-NIMBY Law by Rejecting Housing Project With No Affordable UnitsUpdatesIn Honchariw v. County of Stanislaus, the California Court of Appeal ruled that the county’s decision to deny a subdivision map for a housing project violated California’s Housing Accountability Act (the Act), also known as the “Anti-NIMBY” law, even though the project did not include any affordable units.
-
10.18.2011San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission Approves Policies to Address Sea Level RiseUpdatesAfter two-and-a-half years of public review, the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC) unanimously approved a comprehensive set of amendments to its Bay Plan to address climate change and the resulting sea level rise anticipated to occur in San Francisco Bay.
-
10.07.2011California Environmental Quality Act Revised to Encourage Solar and Infill ProjectsUpdatesIn recent years, California has enacted numerous laws to encourage solar and infill development. Governor Jerry Brown has now signed Senate Bill 226, which amends the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to further encourage projects designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
-
09.27.2011Governor Signs Bill Streamlining CEQA Litigation for "Environmental Leadership Development Projects"UpdatesCalifornia Governor Jerry Brown just signed AB 900, the Jobs and Economic Improvement Through Environmental Leadership Act of 2011. This bill creates a streamlined litigation process for challenges to environmental impact reports for certain projects that are expected to create jobs and cause relatively few environmental impacts. The bill allows these cases to be heard directly by the court of appeal, on an expedited basis, bypassing the trial court.
-
08.31.2011California Supreme Court Clarifies Interaction of Federal Clean Water Act and California State Law Governing California Energy Commission JurisdictionUpdatesFor power plants over 50 megawatts, the Warren-Alquist Act provides a “one stop” permitting scheme at the California Energy Commission to obtain certain permits, but not Clean Water Act discharge permits.
-
08.17.2011California Supreme Court Gives Redevelopment Agencies a Temporary ReprieveUpdatesIn June of this year, the California legislature passed two bills designed to address the state’s budget crisis. The bills addressed redevelopment agencies, which are local agencies created to use property tax funds to redevelop blighted areas. ABX1 26 suspended most redevelopment agencies and provided for their gradual dissolution. It barred redevelopment agencies from taking action other than paying existing debts, performing existing contractual obligations and setting aside reserves required for bonds.
-
07.18.2011California Supreme Court Applies "Common Sense" to Plastic Bag Ban and Clarifies CEQA Standing RulesUpdatesSave the Plastic Bag Coalition v. City of Manhattan Beach
-
“Land Use Litigation”Lawyer Publications
Curtin's California Land Use and Planning Law