Professional Biography

Eric B. Wolff Partner

Firmwide Co-Chair, Appeals, Issues & Strategy Practice

  • Seattle

    D +1.206.359.3779

    F +1.206.359.4779

    Seattle

    1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900

    Seattle, WA 98101-3099

    +1.206.359.3779

    EWolff@perkinscoie.com

loader

Overview

Experience

Tyson Foods v. Garcia

Maryland Court of Appeals
Successfully argued on an appeal for Tyson Foods in Maryland, where the company had lost a $2 million judgment. The Maryland Court of Appeals reversed the lower appellate court and ordered judgment in Tyson’s favor.

City of Livonia Employees’ Retirement System v. Boeing

Argued successfully City of Livonia Employees’ Retirement System v. Boeing, 711 F.3d 754 (7th Cir. 2013), an appeal involving a high-profile securities fraud class action in which a district court found that the Robbins Geller law firm misrepresented critical facts about a confidential source in order to survive a motion to dismiss. Listen to the oral argument here. Eric also represented Boeing successfully on remand. The district court’s order sanctioning Robbins Geller is City of Livonia Employees’ Ret. Sys. v. Boeing Co., 2014 WL 4199136 (N.D. Ill. Aug. 21, 2014).

Junhong v. Boeing

Argued an appeal in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in this aviation mass tort involving federal removal of state court cases arising from the July 2013 crash of an Asiana Airlines 777. Listen to the oral argument here.

Fortaner v. Boeing

Argued and prevailed in Fortaner v. Boeing, 504 F. Appx. 573 (9th Cir. 2013) (unpublished), an appeal about whether lawsuits filed in the United States concerning the August 2008 crash of a Spanish airliner in Spain should proceed in the United States or be dismissed under the doctrine of forum non conveniens because Spain was the proper forum. Listen to the oral argument here.

Tides v. Boeing*

Presented a successful argument in Tides v. Boeing, (No. 10-35238, 9th Cir., 2011), an appeal Eric argued while he was an in-house lawyer at Boeing, about whether the Sarbanes-Oxley Act whistleblower protections apply when employees have unauthorized contact with the media.

 *Prior Experience

News

Insights

RELATED INFORMATION

Bar and Court Admissions

  • Washington
  • Supreme Court of the United States
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
  • U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington
  • U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Washington
  • U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Education

  • UC Berkeley School of Law, J.D., (Boalt Hall), 1998
  • Concordia College, B.A., Philosophy; Writing, 1995