Albert Gidari, Jr.

Perkins Coie Partner Albert Gidari was featured yesterday in National Review Online's blog The Corner in a post titled "Re: Dishonorable Recrimination," providing legal analysis of the recent Maryland lawsuit filed by the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now (ACORN) against the filmmakers who secretly recorded footage of ACORN employees providing financial advice to a couple posing as a pimp and a prostitute.

Perkins Coie Partner Albert Gidari was quoted this week in an article in BNA's Electronic Commerce & Law Report (subscription required to view article), "Attorneys, Academics Sort Through Landmark Case on Computer Searches." An en banc panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals announced new and enhanced guidelines applicable to all search warrants for electronically stored information in the Ninth Circuit. U.S. v. Comprehensive Drug Testing, Inc., __ F.3d __, 2009 WL 2605378 (9th Cir. Aug. 26, 2009). The decision sets clear ground rules that give teeth to the Fourth Amendment and help protect companies and management from government overreaching in this area.

Perkins Coie Partner Albert Gidari was quoted in "Snooping on Web Traffic Gains Favor Amid Fears," a Wall Street Journal article published on July 29.  The article focuses on the growth of the use of deep packet inspection, a technology that enables network operators to monitor packets of information being transmitted on the Internet.  The technology, which is being used for the management of network traffic, as well as marketing and law-enforcement surveillance, has raised privacy concerns.

In an article on the use of cell phones as an investigative tool for law enforcement, Perkins Coie Partner Albert Gidari told The New York Times that wireless carriers "receive hundreds of requests a month from law enforcement" for real-time tracking. The article focuses on the privacy issues that arise as a result of such tracking. In a case before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, judges are deciding whether search warrants should be required for law enforcement to obtain cell phone tracking data.

In big and small screen thrillers law enforcement is able to track you via your cell phone signal in seconds flat. But how real is that capability and what privacy safeguards are in place when everyone’s got a cell phone? In an interview featured on the NPR program On The Media, Perkins Coie Privacy Partner Al Gidari explains how your cell phone signal may know you better then you know yourself.

Proposed legislation that would mandate storage of IP address and other information by ISPs may aid law enforcement but would open up ISPs to more civil discovery demands by those seeking to enforce intellectual property rights like the music industry or even in divorce cases when a spouse seeks to show the viewing habits of the other spouse.  ISPs also have their own interest in using the data for advertising and network monitoring purposes.  Gidari discussed the history of the laws that give ISPs broad rights to use the data, and the privacy risks associated with those uses.

Partner Albert Gidari was quoted this week in a CNET article on lawmakers' efforts to require Internet service providers and operators of Wi-Fi access points to keep records about users for two years to aid police investigations.

Partner Albert Gidari was quoted in the January 2009 cover story in Popular Mechanics, "When Hackers Attack: Practicing Cybersecurity at Home." The article describes how the increasing use of digital tools is leaving consumers vulnerable to privacy and data security breaches.

Perkins Coie Partner Al Gidari was quoted in a story focusing on NeuStar, a company that runs a digital directory for telephone companies. The story explains how the FBI sought access a few years ago to one of NeuStar's databases that "contained 310 million phone numbers in the United States and Canada." The request was denied, but NeuStar set up a site where law enforcement officials with court orders can obtain information on telephone numbers.

Perkins Coie Partner Al Gidari was quoted this week in an article in the BNA's Electronic Commerce & Law Report on the New Jersey Supreme Court ruling that "customers of Internet service providers have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their subscriber information."

Perkins Coie Partner Al Gidari was quoted today in CNET's Iconoclast blog in a posting entitled, "FBI's Net Surveillance Proposal Raises Privacy, Legal Concerns."

Perkins Coie Partner Al Gidari was quoted Tuesday in a Washington Post article entitled, "FBI Data Transfers Via Telecoms Questioned."

Seattle Partner Al Gidari was quoted in the cover story of the April 4, 2008, edition of the National Journal. The article, "Surveillance Standoff" reviewed how the evolution of telecommunications technology has impacted surveillance laws and created a push-pull tension between the federal government and technology companies and civil-liberties activists.

Seattle Partner Albert Gidari was quoted in an article titled "Cellphone Tracking Powers on Request: Secret Warrants Granted Without Probable Cause," (registration required) which appeared on page 1 of the Washington Post. 

Seattle Partner Al Gidari was quoted in an article in the Washington Post about pending legislation in Congress that may allow federal intelligence gathering on library patrons without sufficient court oversight.

Perkins Coie is proud to announce that 117 of its attorneys throughout the country were selected for inclusion in the 2008 edition of The Best Lawyers in America.

Sixty-three Perkins Coie attorneys in 21 practice areas have been honored by their peers as "Washington Super Lawyers" for 2007.

Seattle Partner Al Gidari was quoted about CALEA and surveillance abilities in the Seattle Post-Intelligencer.

Seattle Partner Al Gidari was quoted in an article about parents' rights to access their deceased children's online accounts that appeared in Willamette Week.

Al Gidari, a partner in the firm's Seattle office, was quoted in Telephony's Technology Update.

Al Gidari, a partner in the firm's Seattle office, was interviewed by KIRO 7 Eyewitness News on social networking Web sites.

Al Gidari, a partner in the firm's Seattle office, was interviewed by KIRO 7 Eyewitness News.

Al Gidari, a partner in the firm's Seattle office, was quoted in The New York Times.

Al Gidari, a partner in the firm's Seattle office, was quoted in The New York Times.

Al Gidari, a partner in the firm's Seattle office, was quoted in The National Law Journal. 

Al Gidari, a partner in the firm's Seattle office, was quoted in The National Law Journal.

Seattle partner Al Gidari spoke at the FTC Spam Forum on wireless spam.

Al Gidari, a partner in the firm's Seattle office, was quoted in InfoWord.

Al Gidari, a partner in the firm's Seattle office, was quoted in CIO Magazine.

Al Gidari, a partner in the firm's Seattle office, was quoted in The Seattle Times.

Al Gidari, a partner in the firm's Seattle office, was quoted in The Seattle Times.

Al Gidari, a partner in the firm's Seattle office, was quoted in Wired Magazine.

Al Gidari, a partner in the firm's Seattle office, was quoted in The New York Times.

Al Gidari, a partner in the firm's Seattle office, was quoted in The National Law Journal.

Al Gidari, a partner in the firm's Seattle office, was quoted in The National Law Journal.

This chart provides information regarding security breach notification legislation which has been enacted in U.S. jurisdictions. The pioneering statute on this issue, California's Security Breach Notification Act (Senate Bill No. 1386), is used as the baseline for comparisons herein.

The federal government's long-running investigation into steroid use in Major League Baseball has yielded more than just newspaper headlines and embarrassed sluggers. Last week, an en banc panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewing the steroid investigation announced new and enhanced guidelines applicable to all search warrants for electronically stored information ("ESI") in the Ninth Circuit.

The FTC recently extended the enforcement deadline for the Red Flags Rule until November 1, 2009. The Rule was originally scheduled to go into effect on November 1, 2008, but on Wednesday, July 29, 2009, the FTC announced that it was delaying enforcement for the third time because a number of industries and entities within the FTC’s jurisdiction still expressed confusion and uncertainty about what types of entities would be subject to the Rule and what the Rule actually required of covered entities.