|
China Practice
|
Defended a Chinese company in Section 337 action for patent infringement regarding ground fault circuit interrupters.
|
Assisted Chinese company in setting up the infrastructure for managing intellectual property and assisted in analyzing patent landscape for new products.
|
Provided patent strategy advice for a Chinese battery manufacturer.
|
Patent application preparation and prosecution for a Zhuhai-based Chinese biomarker company.
|
Provided litigation advice and prepared patent application for Shenzhen-based Chinese camera equipment company.
|
Prosecuted patent applications and conducted due diligence for Chinese biotech company.
|
|
Patent
|
Patent preparation and prosecution related to novel methodology for creating transgenic animals.
|
Patent preparation, prosecution, counseling and due diligence related to earth-friendly disposable rigid packaging for the food and nonfood consumer markets.
|
Patent preparation, prosecution and counseling for the Cargill Salt Group; patent due diligence for the Cargill Venture Group.
|
Patent preparation and prosecution related to biopharmaceuticals.
|
Patent preparation, prosecution, and counseling related to small molecule therapeutics, vaccines, scientific techniques, diagnostic methods, and medical devices.
|
Patent preparation and prosecution related to rational design and bioinformatics.
|
Patent preparation, prosecution, counseling and due diligence related to edible thin films.
|
Patent preparation, prosecution, counseling and due diligence related to methods for manufacturing, extracting and purifying sucralose.
|
Performed due diligence and counseling, and prepared and prosecuted patents relating to biopharmaceuticals.
|
Patent preparation, prosecution, counseling and due diligence related to thermochromic bar codes for food safety.
|
Patent preparation and prosecution related to novel tripeptide.
|
|
Litigation
|
|
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Represented plaintiff in patent infringement action. Case settled favorably after the beginning of discovery.
|
|
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Represented plaintiff in a declaratory judgment action of patent invalidity and non-infringement. Case pending.
|
|
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California
Represented plaintiffs in patent infringement action and including defending plaintiff on claims of patent infringement asserted by defendant. Prevailed on motion for summary judgment of non-infringement after close of discovery.
|
|
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Represented defendant in trademark dispute over domain name. Case settled favorable during discovery.
|
|
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Represented defendants in patent infringement action. Case settled favorably during discovery.
|
|
U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware
Represented defendant in a Section 146 appeal of an interference proceeding. Obtained a dismissal of the appeal under F.R.C.P. 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
|
|
U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York
Represented defendant in patent infringement action. Case resolved by acquisition of defendant while two motions for summary judgment for invalidity of patent-in-suit pending.
|
|
U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon
Represented defendant in patent infringement action. Case heavily litigated and settled favorably before trial.
|
|
U.S. District Court for the Western District of New York
Represented defendant in patent infringement action. Case heavily litigated during discovery. Settled favorably before trial.
|
|
U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington
Represented defendant in a Section 146 appeal of an interference proceeding. Obtained a limiting order on the scope of the appeal. Plaintiff requested dismissal of action thereafter.
|
|
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California
Represented defendant in a patent infringement action. Won motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of all claims of three patents-in-suit. Case settled favorably on appeal.
|
|
U.S. District Court for the Central District of California
Represented plaintiff in patent infringement action. Case settled favorably after defendants motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction was denied.
|